In an explicit contract, written or oral words are used to conclude the contract, while a tacit contract is entered into as a result of deeds. Sometimes the ancestral expression “actions speak louder than words” has a lot of weight. In order for an explicit contract to be considered valid in court, the parties must either exchange something, value, or suffer a loss of any kind. This binds them under the terms of the contract by expecting them to maintain their end of good deal, either to earn their reward or to compensate for their loss. As a general rule, this element of the contract is performed by parties who agree to pay money in exchange for goods delivered or services provided by the other party. An explicit contract is a legally binding agreement, the terms of which are all clearly stated orally or in writing. For an explicit contract to be entered into, there must be an offer from one of the parties and acceptance of that offer by the other party. To determine whether an explicit contract has been entered into correctly, the courts will analyze communications between the parties during the drafting of the contract. To study this concept, you must follow the following express definition of the contract. The existence of an explicit agreement is proven by the parties` actual written contract or by their oral statement that they accept the terms of the contract. If an explicit contract can be entered into in writing or orally, a tacit contract is entered into without a written document.
Michelle Marvin claimed that she and actor Lee Marvin had “made a verbal agreement” in October 1964 that the couple, while living together, would pool their income and participate in the same way in the fortune they accumulated. Michelle also stated that she and Lee had agreed that they would represent the public, that they were husband and wife when they were not married. Michelle has also served Lee as a companion, housewife, cook and housekeeper.