Scoble writes about his experience’s with Second Life, and the fact he has been basically forced to stop his 12 year old son using it.
Now he talks about the Nanny State and the fact that we have to many rules from above. Can’t say I disagree with him on that one. Western Australia is the ultimate in nanny states, and Australia as a whole isn’t much better.
The drinking and gambling ages in the US are a complete joke. You can die in Iraq at 18 but you can’t have a drink until 21. It’s stupid.
But I’ve got to ask. Is it right that Scoble exposes his 12 year old son to virtual porn and gambling?
I can remember last year I read that he let his son listen to the Dawn and Drew Show. Now personally, I quite enjoy the Dawn and Drew show, but it ain’t suitable for kiddies. I was going to write about it at The Blog Herald at the time, but I was already in the middle of a flame war on another topic and didn’t want the grief.
Now I read that he allows his son to play the Adults Only Second Life, a world which I’m personally quite into, but again, it’s AO.
Now I’m all for teaching your kids about this stuff….eventually. I’m certainly no prude. But Scoble’s son isn’t even a teenager yet, and he’s being let lose in a world which made headlines last week because some of its participants are engaging in virtual sex acts where one plays the role of a child. Yep, virtual paedophilia.
Writes Scoble:
The thing is, I don’t necessarily buy into the rules of society, or the rules of Linden Labs. If I don’t mind my son getting into a Poker game, or seeing a virtual sex act, isn’t that my right as a parent to let my son experience those things?
Actually you know what, I honestly don’t believe it is. A 12 year old is not ready to be exposed to this sort of thing. Personally I think it’s totally wrong. Indeed, in Australia you’d probably end up being investigated by Child Services (or similar bodies depending on your state) for allowing these things to happen.
Of course, we all know from our own childhoods that, particularly as teens, we all eventually get up to some no good. But we aren’t even talking about a teen here, we are talking about a pre-pubescent child. Children do need protecting, and I’m even going to dare to suggest that in this case, I’d think Scoble’s son may need protecting from him.
How do you feel. Would you let your 11 or 12 year old child view porn and gambling? Flame away if you must, but I can tell you my son will be a fair bit older before I start teaching him about this sort of thing. Kids should be allowed to be kids whilst they still can be, and nothing positive can come from exposing a 12 year old to virtual sex acts.
Tags: robert scoble