
Category: Uncategorized
-
You’re home early

you’re home early. -
Food for Thought

food for thought -
On the dawn of my next great enterprise
The next site is ready to go. Indeed the template seems 99% there and we’re not launching yet because I never launch a site without some serious content up.
It’s going up within the next 2 weeks.
But I digress.
The new site covers a niche. It’s opposite to The Inquisitr which was always about volume.
I’m not saying volume is wrong but this site will never scale like The Inquisitr. What I’m hoping is that the CPM’s are so much higher that we can build strong traffic, but traffic that pays far higher rates.
I’ve already been asked by friends why not do a similar model again (like Inq) I mean, 8m+ page views in the third year were and remain awesome.
Maybe I’m a sadist, but I love a new challenge. I love taking on a new model and seeing if it works. Sure I could repeat what I’ve done before, but where is the fun, and challenge in that.
The new site is different, and a risk, but in many ways that’s the joy of it.
What I will say is the template is 99% finished and the team is starting to post. But we won’t launch until later this week or early next week. When I launch, I launch with content.
Thanks to everyone who has encouraged me, sent me good wishes, and also been my friend. I know that what I do for a living is a bit nuts…least the banks always tell me that when they refuse me money 🙂 But each time I start a new site, I am for higher traffic and more support than the one before. I can only hope that you all like it and will support me once again.
This site won’t appeal to everyone, but we will own an unmet niche, and I’d hope define a new media niche that hasn’t ever seriously been covered before.
I’ll be back in a week with the launch. Wish me luck 🙂
-
Test
just a quick test to see if we’re working
-
What if the problem wasn’t Rugby League’s alone?
This whole debate over player behavior in Rugby League is bizarre. On the radio the other morning, John Faine went as far as comparing RL to AFL, suggesting that the problem was one of Rugby League’s alone.
Of course that’s bollocks. Anyone who has ever been around a football club of any code knows that these problems are evident in all, and you only have to go through the record of the AFL and see players there mucking up.
But what if the problem was one of sport, or male team sport in particular?
Consider this: DUIs the biggest off-field problem for NFL
The drinking problem is happening in the US as well. The difference in the US perhaps is that group sex wouldn’t raise an eyebrow.
-
Inquisitr’s 1st birthday + April stats
First birthday post on The Inquisitr here.
I won’t do a huge stats post this month. Short version: 2.34m page views, just over February’s previous record of 2.31m I also managed to screw up the GAnalytics code this month, so there’s a day and a half missing in the total count. I’m guessing the total was around 2.45m.
Technorati out to 235. Weird month. We got in as close as 120 at one stage, then out to over 300. The six months prior was a growth time, so we’re not getting as many links as we’re losing, but not by much.
Finances were down CPM off March, which isn’t surprising given March was a strong month. The counter was more traffic in April which means while we made less this month, it wasn’t as big a drop as it might have been. We’re also ahead of Jan/ Feb on a CPM basis, so although it’s disappointing to see a drop, it’s not as bad as it once was. Overheads are up in April with the addition of two CPM based writers, which will be bigger again in May with Paul Short being made permanent.
-
Conroy’s internet filter ‘won’t stop child porn’
Courier Mail: Stephen Conroy’s internet filter ‘won’t stop child porn’
Question then, if it won’t stop child porn, why do it at all?
After all, it was Conroy who continually said that the filter was all about child porn.
“Black lists are needed to combat child pornography” Conroy (The West)
On the overall policy: “It also focuses on managing current threats through technical mechanisms such as ISP-level filtering of illegal material including child pornography.” Conroy (speech)
“Central to the Government?¢‚Ǩ‚Ñ¢s plan to make the internet a safer place for children is the introduction of Internet Service Provider (ISP) level filtering of material such as child pornography.” Conroy (media release)
“Conroy told the media that it would censor online child pornography and other ?¢‚Ǩ?ìinappropriate material”” WSWS
“If people equate freedom of speech with watching child pornography, then the Rudd-Labor Government is going to disagree.” Conroy (ABC)
“We are not building the Great Wall of China. We are going after the filth – like child pornography. Its been done around the world and it can be done here.” Conroy (IT News)
The last quote is important: Conroy now claims that the filter isn’t a silver bullet, but said that the filter was all about blocking child porn, which he now says it won’t stop.
So what is it then?
Time to go Senator Conroy, if you keep up these backflips you’ll end up with a broken back.
One last quote out of the UK, which I think fits here
BT admitted that the UK’s “Cleanfeed” scheme was “intended to prevent users inadvertently accessing illegal material, rather than to stop hardened paedophiles.” ZDNetSort of sums up Conroy’s policy doesn’t it.
-
How the RBA f&*ked over the non-bank banking sector
On March 3, the Reserve Bank in Australia (RBA) abolished bank intercharge fees on ATM’s in favor of a pay to use system where consumers pay a rate determined by the owner of the ATM.
This was allegedly about reducing charges for consumers, and providing a more transparent charging regime.
Reserve Bank assistant governor of financial system Philip Lowe says the reforms of ATM fees, which came into affect on March 3, have increased competition and benefited consumers.
Dr Lowe said that across the entire system most cardholders were paying no more for ATM transactions than previously and some “may have the opportunity to play less”.
What has happened since March 3 is that most foreign ATM’s (that is, ATM’s not owned by the bank you bank with) now impose a $2 withdrawal charge.
In theory, you can opt not to cop the fee by only using your own banks ATM. But what if your bank or bank like institution doesn’t have ATMs, or more particularly an accessible supply of ATM’s.
My credit union doesn’t.
Until March 3 I could use any ATM and not cop a charge. As of April 1 (the Credit Union is rebating the fees this month) I’ll have to pay money to withdraw money from an ATM.
Oh, but you can use EFTPOS or the PostOffice. Great. The reason I switched to my current Credit Union is because my last Credit Union ran the same line and I never had free use of ATMs. The current credit union has teamed up with some other credit unions for the “Redi” ATM network, but the nearest one is 10 kms away and no where near anywhere I regularly go.
So the RBA says that I should be saving money, but now I’ll be paying fees where I never have before, and there’s really no 24/7 alternative.
Thing is, there are still a fair few small credit unions around with a similar setup, particularly employee related Unions.
In effect, the RBA has actually done more in entrenching the big four and reducing competition than it ever has before. Little credit unions can’t compete on ATM’s, and customers want access to fee free ATM’s. The big four with their army of ATM’s win out.
An epic failure in public policy.
-
ACMA Prohibited Links: where does the liability fall?
Is it illegal for Australians to link to the alleged ACMA blacklist on Wikileaks?
Here’s ACMA quoted at news.com.au
ACMA threatens fines of up to $11,000 a day for linking to sites on its secret censorship blacklist
I’m not a lawyer, so I could be wrong, but is it actually illegal for individuals to link to the list?
The Communications Legislation Amendment (Content Services) Act 2007 which details Schedule 7 of the Broadcasting Act and the links offense refers to “service providers” in Section 62 and I can find no reference to individuals.
I make the query because when ACMA went after a link to prohibited content on Whirlpool, they didn’t go after Whirlpool or the person who posted the link, they went after the web host. From The Oz
On March 10, ACMA issued Sydney web hosting company Bulletproof Networks with an “interim link-deletion notice” for allowing its customer, the Whirlpool internet community website, to post the link to an anti-abortion web page blacklisted by the regulator.
This doesn’t negate the fact that sites hosting links to prohibited content under the act can and are deemed prohibited themselves, only that the individuals may not be liable under the Act for placing the link, only the web hosts who are hosting the link.
Personally I haven’t linked to it, although I commend those that have. Ultimately I don’t want any site I own on the Governments blacklist for commercial reasons, so it’s a risk I’m not willing to take, because despite possibly no individual liability, sites can and will be banned.
If anyone knows differently, let me know, I could be wrong here, but this is how I read it.
Update: it could possibly be argued under different parts of the act (or a different act) that the act of linking is the promotion of illegal material and may be illegal, but even in this case, the $11,000 fines relate to “service providers” and not individuals.
